The social ills associated with problem players are widespread and often go beyond an addition to the game. Problems with gambling can lead to bankruptcy, crime, domestic abuse, and even suicide. A single bankruptcy could affect 17 people. Gambling affects intimate partners and other family members as well.
Creates a wedge between family members due to single-person gambling addiction. Deteriorating relationships and financial loss are common impacts of gambling on families. This often delays recovery and treatment and allows gambling addiction to cause other serious effects, such as job losses, failed relationships and serious debts. Problems with gambling are often associated with mental health problems, such as depression, anxiety, and mood disorders.
Problems with gambling don't just affect mental health. People who have struggled with gambling benefit greatly from treatment and often need family and financial counseling to fully recover as well. The social harms that result from addictive gameplay are not just for the player. For example, the wives of the players in our study reported how they could feel there was a problem, but they believed that they were struggling with marital problems, rather than the consequences of gambling addiction.
The players' parents and children reported that they could no longer trust the player, that they could no longer leave the money unattended, and that the player had become someone they didn't recognize or understand. Although the PhiGam model tries to be as universal as possible, it is important to keep in mind that the context in which gambling takes place is essential when examining the impacts of gambling. Unfortunately, the study was based on several key, but unproven, assumptions that may have had the effect of overestimating the costs associated with pathological and problematic gambling and minimizing the benefits of casino gambling. This debate advocates a theoretical conceptual model based on literature on the impacts of gambling, where a public health perspective is applied.
Despite the fact that some pathological players seek treatment even when they win, it can be argued that those who seek treatment are generally worse off financially and therefore have accumulated greater debts than those who do not receive treatment. The approach taken by these researchers to arrive at cost estimates of pathological and problematic gambling involved the use of a survey instrument to obtain information from players with serious problems in Wisconsin (Thompson et al. Financial damage from gambling has been shown to be more common in disadvantaged areas, while in Macau, nominal wages of people working in gambling and related industries have increased due to casino liberalization. Input-output models are flexible enough to assess the effects of plant expansions, contractions and closures (Richardson, 1977).
While there are addiction treatment centers across the country that include services to address harmful gambling, there is little help for those affected by the partner or family. members' game. Drug abuse, alcoholism, domestic abuse and bankruptcy are some of the problems that can arise from gambling. When attempting to analyze the economic effects, especially the social costs associated with gambling problems, estimates are taken directly from other studies, without any independent analysis or attempts to.
In most of the impact analyses of gambling and pathological and problematic gambling, the methods used are so inadequate that they invalidate the conclusions. Since the Gambling Commission, the industry regulator, found that 43% of people who use the machines are players with problems or at risk, some such as opposition Labour MP Tom Watson, have described this as “a wasted opportunity.”. The growth of legal gambling in the United States in recent decades has been largely driven by the growing public acceptance of gambling as a form of recreation and by the promise of substantial economic benefits and tax revenues for gambling communities. When measuring the economic effects of pathological and problematic gambling (Lesieur, 1989, 1992, 199), financial costs such as debt, insurance, medical, work-related and criminal justice expenses are fairly easy to measure.
. .
